tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4921692378523167792.post6486886519356730893..comments2023-11-02T15:31:41.417+06:00Comments on Contrarian Comment: David Mulford on Pak role in 26/11Zeemaxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06569356440176591602noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4921692378523167792.post-35910284710586756552009-01-29T01:57:00.000+06:002009-01-29T01:57:00.000+06:00Nastasia,Did I say FBI? It should have been CIA. C...Nastasia,<BR/><BR/>Did I say FBI? It should have been CIA. Correct. I write from memory and sometimes words get mixed up, so forgive the small transgressions.Zeemaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06569356440176591602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4921692378523167792.post-23299400619506774242009-01-29T01:36:00.000+06:002009-01-29T01:36:00.000+06:00Evidence? Facts? Credibility?Yes, basic facts woul...Evidence? Facts? Credibility?<BR/>Yes, basic facts would be good, you should get yours straight as well. It will be impossible to determine the credibility of the FBI on yellowcake, as they had nothing to do with that incident. You're confusing them with the CIA. This means your credibility is only as good as your false assertions too, does it not?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com